|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
02/10/2015 |
Actualizado : |
12/10/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Autor : |
FREY, G.E; PACHAS, A.N; NOELLEMEYER, E.; BALMELLI, G.; FASSOLA, H.E.; COLCOMBET, L; STEVENSON, H.D.; HAMILTON, J; HUBBARD, W; CUBBAGE, F.W. |
Afiliación : |
GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Resumen y comparación de los sistemas silvopastoriles en seis regiones del mundo. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2009 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
En: Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles, 1., 2009, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina Actas. Buenos Aires (Argentina): INTA, 2009. |
Páginas : |
p. 435-446 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
A pesar de que los sistemas silvopastoriles representan una clase única de sistemas productivos que combinan árboles, forraje y ganado, no son homogéneos en ningún sentido. Los productores integran ganado con plantaciones forestales y bosques nativos en diversas maneras y propósitos. En algunas regiones, la cultura y la tradición determinan que los productores enfoquen su manejo principalmente hacia el ganado y forraje o bien en los árboles, mientras que en otras regiones el enfoque está orientado hacia la producción conjunta. Se presenta una breve descripción y comparación de los sistemas silvopastoriles en seis regiones de cinco países del mundo: Misiones y Corrientes, Argentina, La Pampa, Argentina, el sureste de los Estados Unidos, la Isla Norte de Nueva Zelanda, Paraguay y Uruguay. Luego, se califican los sistemas silvopastoriles en términos del nivel de adopción, nivel de investigación, si reducen los costos o aumentan las rentas y si existe el manejo para la producción conjunta de todos los componentes. Se observó que existen semejanzas y diferencias entre los SSP de las regiones evaluadas. |
Palabras claves : |
ADOPTION; RESEARCH; SOUTH AMERICA. |
Thesagro : |
ARGENTINA; ESTADOS DEL SUDESTE (EUA); NUEVA ZELANDA; PARAGUAY; SISTEMAS SILVOPASCICOLAS; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
Marc : |
LEADER 02105nam a2200337 a 4500 001 1053472 005 2020-10-12 008 2009 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aFREY, G.E 245 $aResumen y comparación de los sistemas silvopastoriles en seis regiones del mundo. 260 $aEn: Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles, 1., 2009, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina Actas. Buenos Aires (Argentina): INTA$c2009 300 $ap. 435-446 520 $aA pesar de que los sistemas silvopastoriles representan una clase única de sistemas productivos que combinan árboles, forraje y ganado, no son homogéneos en ningún sentido. Los productores integran ganado con plantaciones forestales y bosques nativos en diversas maneras y propósitos. En algunas regiones, la cultura y la tradición determinan que los productores enfoquen su manejo principalmente hacia el ganado y forraje o bien en los árboles, mientras que en otras regiones el enfoque está orientado hacia la producción conjunta. Se presenta una breve descripción y comparación de los sistemas silvopastoriles en seis regiones de cinco países del mundo: Misiones y Corrientes, Argentina, La Pampa, Argentina, el sureste de los Estados Unidos, la Isla Norte de Nueva Zelanda, Paraguay y Uruguay. Luego, se califican los sistemas silvopastoriles en términos del nivel de adopción, nivel de investigación, si reducen los costos o aumentan las rentas y si existe el manejo para la producción conjunta de todos los componentes. Se observó que existen semejanzas y diferencias entre los SSP de las regiones evaluadas. 650 $aARGENTINA 650 $aESTADOS DEL SUDESTE (EUA) 650 $aNUEVA ZELANDA 650 $aPARAGUAY 650 $aSISTEMAS SILVOPASCICOLAS 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aADOPTION 653 $aRESEARCH 653 $aSOUTH AMERICA 700 1 $aPACHAS, A.N 700 1 $aNOELLEMEYER, E. 700 1 $aBALMELLI, G. 700 1 $aFASSOLA, H.E. 700 1 $aCOLCOMBET, L 700 1 $aSTEVENSON, H.D. 700 1 $aHAMILTON, J 700 1 $aHUBBARD, W 700 1 $aCUBBAGE, F.W.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
30/09/2014 |
Actualizado : |
25/01/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 1 |
Autor : |
GALIETTA, G.; EGANA, E.; GEMELLI, F.; MAESO, D.; CASCO, M.; CONDE, P. |
Afiliación : |
DIEGO CESAR MAESO TOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA NOELIA CASCO MILA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; ANA PAULA CONDE INNAMORATO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Pesticide dissipation curves in peach, pear and tomato crops in Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2011 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Environmental Science and Health :part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, v. 46, n.1, p. 35-40, 2011. |
ISSN : |
0360-1234 |
DOI : |
10.1080/03601234.2010.515504 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 02 Jun 2010, Published online: 10 Dec 2010. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Dissipation curves of azoxystrobin and of the neonicotinoids acetamiprid and thiacloprid in peach; azinphos-methyl and carbaryl in pear and azoxystrobin, chlorfenapyr and chlorpyrifos in high-tunnel tomato crops were studied in the Southern region of Uruguay. An analytical methodology based on solid phase extraction (SPE) and detection by High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode Array Detector (HPLC/DAD) was used for acetamiprid and thiacloprid. Coupled SPE and detection by Gas Chromatography with Mass Selective Detector (GC/MSD) was used for the detection of azinphos-methyl, azoxystrobin, carbaryl, chlorfenapyr and chlorpyrifos residues. Curves were modeled mathematically with Solver program of Microsoft Excel. The best fit for acetamiprid and thiacloprid in peach was achieved with the exponential model (r(2)=0.961 and 0.944, respectively). In the case of peach fruits there is not a Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) for acetamiprid in the Codex Alimentarius, while 0.5 mg/kg is the value rated for thiacloprid. The MRLs accepted by the European Union (EU) are 0.1 mg/kg for acetamiprid and 0.3 mg/kg for thiacloprid. According to the curves determined in these experiments, thiacloprid residues 10 to 12 days after application (daa) were below the MRLs established by both sources. In the case of acetamiprid, 25 daa would be required, according to the exponential mathematical model, to get residues levels below the MRL values established by the EU. For azinphos methyl in pear, the residues detected were mathematically fitted to an exponential model (r(2)=0.999). According to it, residue levels under the MRL established by the EU (0.05 mg/kg) are gotten in our conditions in 20 daa. In plastic tunnel tomato chlorfenapyr residues were not detected from 16 daa, having the dissipation curve an exponential trend. In the same condition, there was not a decay of the azoxystrobin concentration during a 24-day trial, being it around 0.40 ± 0.05 mg/kg. MenosAbstract:
Dissipation curves of azoxystrobin and of the neonicotinoids acetamiprid and thiacloprid in peach; azinphos-methyl and carbaryl in pear and azoxystrobin, chlorfenapyr and chlorpyrifos in high-tunnel tomato crops were studied in the Southern region of Uruguay. An analytical methodology based on solid phase extraction (SPE) and detection by High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode Array Detector (HPLC/DAD) was used for acetamiprid and thiacloprid. Coupled SPE and detection by Gas Chromatography with Mass Selective Detector (GC/MSD) was used for the detection of azinphos-methyl, azoxystrobin, carbaryl, chlorfenapyr and chlorpyrifos residues. Curves were modeled mathematically with Solver program of Microsoft Excel. The best fit for acetamiprid and thiacloprid in peach was achieved with the exponential model (r(2)=0.961 and 0.944, respectively). In the case of peach fruits there is not a Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) for acetamiprid in the Codex Alimentarius, while 0.5 mg/kg is the value rated for thiacloprid. The MRLs accepted by the European Union (EU) are 0.1 mg/kg for acetamiprid and 0.3 mg/kg for thiacloprid. According to the curves determined in these experiments, thiacloprid residues 10 to 12 days after application (daa) were below the MRLs established by both sources. In the case of acetamiprid, 25 daa would be required, according to the exponential mathematical model, to get residues levels below the MRL values established by the EU. For azinphos methyl... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CURVAS DE DISIPACIÓN; DISSIPATION CURVES; DURAZNO; GC/MSD; HPLC/DAD; HPLC/PAPA; PEACH; PEAR; PERA; PESTICIDAS DE RESIDUOS; RESIDUES PESTICIDES; TOMATE; TOMATO. |
Thesagro : |
FRUTICULTURA; HORTICULTURA. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
Marc : |
LEADER 03145naa a2200397 a 4500 001 1050743 005 2019-01-25 008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0360-1234 024 7 $a10.1080/03601234.2010.515504$2DOI 100 1 $aGALIETTA, G. 245 $aPesticide dissipation curves in peach, pear and tomato crops in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2011 500 $aArticle history: Received 02 Jun 2010, Published online: 10 Dec 2010. 520 $aAbstract: Dissipation curves of azoxystrobin and of the neonicotinoids acetamiprid and thiacloprid in peach; azinphos-methyl and carbaryl in pear and azoxystrobin, chlorfenapyr and chlorpyrifos in high-tunnel tomato crops were studied in the Southern region of Uruguay. An analytical methodology based on solid phase extraction (SPE) and detection by High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode Array Detector (HPLC/DAD) was used for acetamiprid and thiacloprid. Coupled SPE and detection by Gas Chromatography with Mass Selective Detector (GC/MSD) was used for the detection of azinphos-methyl, azoxystrobin, carbaryl, chlorfenapyr and chlorpyrifos residues. Curves were modeled mathematically with Solver program of Microsoft Excel. The best fit for acetamiprid and thiacloprid in peach was achieved with the exponential model (r(2)=0.961 and 0.944, respectively). In the case of peach fruits there is not a Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) for acetamiprid in the Codex Alimentarius, while 0.5 mg/kg is the value rated for thiacloprid. The MRLs accepted by the European Union (EU) are 0.1 mg/kg for acetamiprid and 0.3 mg/kg for thiacloprid. According to the curves determined in these experiments, thiacloprid residues 10 to 12 days after application (daa) were below the MRLs established by both sources. In the case of acetamiprid, 25 daa would be required, according to the exponential mathematical model, to get residues levels below the MRL values established by the EU. For azinphos methyl in pear, the residues detected were mathematically fitted to an exponential model (r(2)=0.999). According to it, residue levels under the MRL established by the EU (0.05 mg/kg) are gotten in our conditions in 20 daa. In plastic tunnel tomato chlorfenapyr residues were not detected from 16 daa, having the dissipation curve an exponential trend. In the same condition, there was not a decay of the azoxystrobin concentration during a 24-day trial, being it around 0.40 ± 0.05 mg/kg. 650 $aFRUTICULTURA 650 $aHORTICULTURA 653 $aCURVAS DE DISIPACIÓN 653 $aDISSIPATION CURVES 653 $aDURAZNO 653 $aGC/MSD 653 $aHPLC/DAD 653 $aHPLC/PAPA 653 $aPEACH 653 $aPEAR 653 $aPERA 653 $aPESTICIDAS DE RESIDUOS 653 $aRESIDUES PESTICIDES 653 $aTOMATE 653 $aTOMATO 700 1 $aEGANA, E. 700 1 $aGEMELLI, F. 700 1 $aMAESO, D. 700 1 $aCASCO, M. 700 1 $aCONDE, P. 773 $tJournal of Environmental Science and Health :part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes$gv. 46, n.1, p. 35-40, 2011.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|